John Q Khosravi Law Firm
Please contact our office for more information:
John Q. Khosravi Immigration Law Firm (JQK Law Firm)
Email: info@jqklaw.com
Phone: (818) 934-1561
Skype: john.khosravi
Licensed to Practice in CA. Practice Focus on Federal Immigration Law. This Blog is Legal Advertisement.
Thursday, June 18, 2020
Wednesday, June 17, 2020
Tuesday, June 16, 2020
Supreme Court turns aside Justice Department, won't hear California sanctuary cities case
(The state law in question bars police from notifying the feds when immigrants are being released after serving time for local crimes.)
Monday, June 15, 2020
EOIR Update
The Honolulu Immigration Court will resume hearings in non-detained cases on Monday, June 15, 2020. The Boston, Buffalo, Dallas, Hartford, Las Vegas, Memphis, and New Orleans Immigration Courts will resume hearings in non-detained cases on Monday, June 29, 2020. Hearings in non-detained cases at all other immigration courts are postponed through, and including, Friday June 26, 2020.
Saturday, June 13, 2020
Friday, June 12, 2020
Thursday, June 11, 2020
Wednesday, June 10, 2020
Tuesday, June 9, 2020
Monday, June 8, 2020
Saturday, June 6, 2020
DS-160/DS-260 Asking for Voluntary Disclosure of OTHER Social Media
Therefore, by responding “No” to what appears to be an optional request to share information, visa applicants end up affirmatively asserting that they have not used additional social media platforms.
BIA SSN Case:
Respondent sustained a federal conviction for "misuse of a social security number" in violation of 42 USC Sec. 408(a)(7)(B)...On de novo review, and absent contrary circuit law, we conclude that 42 USC Sec. 408(a)(7)(B) does not define a CIMT under the categorical approach because the minimum conduct that has a realistic probability of being prosecuted under the statute-i.e., using a fictitious social security number to get a job and support one's family, id at 828- is not "reprehensible" enough to warrant CIMT treatment, as indicated by the court in Arias. Arias v. Lynch, 834 F.3d at 826-827. Matter of Silva-Trevino, 26 I&N Dec. 826, 834 (BIA 2016)...Moreover, to the extent Marin-Rodriguez v. Holder, 710 F3d 734 (7th Cir. 2013), can be read to support a contrary result, we are bound by the law of the case principles to follow the Arias court's determination that Marin-Rodriguez in inapposite. See 834 F.3d 830.
https://www.scribd.com/document/452083387/M-E-A-AXXX-XXX-871-BIA-Feb-10-2020?secret_password=nwIjFxuPfHcSp8QEGWWA&utm_source=Recent%20Postings%20Alert&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=RP%20Daily
h/t to @lisa koop
Thursday, June 4, 2020
Tuesday, June 2, 2020
Monday, June 1, 2020
Foreigners with criminal convictions who fear they will be tortured if they are deported can challenge denials of their requests to stay in the U.S. in federal courts, the U.S. Supreme Court held Monday.
Foreigners with criminal convictions who fear they will be tortured if they are deported can challenge denials of their requests to stay in the U.S. in federal courts, the U.S. Supreme Court held Monday.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/immigration/articles/1260979/breaking-high-court-allows-circuit-court-review-in-deportation-cases?nl_pk=3d58be1d-130f-45ab-8328-a9ad142de766&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=immigration?copied=1
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/immigration/articles/1260979/breaking-high-court-allows-circuit-court-review-in-deportation-cases?nl_pk=3d58be1d-130f-45ab-8328-a9ad142de766&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=immigration?copied=1
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)